<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reactive Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/</link>
	<description>Random Bits of Whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:04:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: martymankins</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3468</link>
		<dc:creator>martymankins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3468</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;kevin&lt;/b&gt; - The removal of shoes bugs me, too.  Would be nice to be able to leave them on when going through the body scanner.  One can hope they will remove that rule.  It would be nice to enjoy flying again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>kevin</b> &#8211; The removal of shoes bugs me, too.  Would be nice to be able to leave them on when going through the body scanner.  One can hope they will remove that rule.  It would be nice to enjoy flying again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3465</guid>
		<description>Agreed 100% on the reactionary vs proactive approach.  And to be honest, I have no problem with the full body scanner either.  Having to take my bloody shoes off, mind you, pisses me off royally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed 100% on the reactionary vs proactive approach.  And to be honest, I have no problem with the full body scanner either.  Having to take my bloody shoes off, mind you, pisses me off royally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martymankins</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator>martymankins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3439</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;sybil law&lt;/b&gt; - GAH is right.  You make a good point.  It makes too much sense, so it can&#039;t be implemented. There must be more confusing methods of checking passengers.

&lt;b&gt;delmer&lt;/b&gt; - Body scanner just make more sense, unlike the woman you work with who isn&#039;t very good at matching dates to presidential terms.

&lt;b&gt;lisa&lt;/b&gt; - I think the screen is more discreet, much like the current line scanners for luggage and carry-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>sybil law</b> &#8211; GAH is right.  You make a good point.  It makes too much sense, so it can&#8217;t be implemented. There must be more confusing methods of checking passengers.</p>
<p><b>delmer</b> &#8211; Body scanner just make more sense, unlike the woman you work with who isn&#8217;t very good at matching dates to presidential terms.</p>
<p><b>lisa</b> &#8211; I think the screen is more discreet, much like the current line scanners for luggage and carry-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m ok with full body scanners, as long as *I* don&#039;t have to see the screen!  I don&#039;t want to see everyone&#039;s junk in line ahead of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ok with full body scanners, as long as *I* don&#8217;t have to see the screen!  I don&#8217;t want to see everyone&#8217;s junk in line ahead of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delmer</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>delmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d happily submit to a full-body scan.

In other news ... a woman I work with said that terrorisits would never have tried anything like this under Bush -- they see Obama as week.  I can only assume she&#039;s forgotten about The Shoe Bomber.  I don&#039;t know how she categorizes 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d happily submit to a full-body scan.</p>
<p>In other news &#8230; a woman I work with said that terrorisits would never have tried anything like this under Bush &#8212; they see Obama as week.  I can only assume she&#8217;s forgotten about The Shoe Bomber.  I don&#8217;t know how she categorizes 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybil Law</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybil Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3407</guid>
		<description>Agreed, agreed, agreed!!!
But since it makes too much sense, I can&#039;t see it happening.
GAH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, agreed, agreed!!!<br />
But since it makes too much sense, I can&#8217;t see it happening.<br />
GAH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martymankins</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>martymankins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;dave2&lt;/b&gt; - You are so right. Let&#039;s hope the TSA will someday get proactive.

&lt;b&gt;kapgar&lt;/b&gt; - Ha!  That would be cool.  It could be a new trend for people going through security..  well, just the men.  We need to come up with something clever for the females to walk through with/on.

&lt;b&gt;beth&lt;/b&gt; - My secret is out.  Just hope not too many more TSA people need to see and touch them in my suitcase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>dave2</b> &#8211; You are so right. Let&#8217;s hope the TSA will someday get proactive.</p>
<p><b>kapgar</b> &#8211; Ha!  That would be cool.  It could be a new trend for people going through security..  well, just the men.  We need to come up with something clever for the females to walk through with/on.</p>
<p><b>beth</b> &#8211; My secret is out.  Just hope not too many more TSA people need to see and touch them in my suitcase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>You have thong panties??!!!  And I thought I knew you......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have thong panties??!!!  And I thought I knew you&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kapgar</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>kapgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>I still think that everyone should take a Viagra before going through the body scanner to give them something to really enjoy. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that everyone should take a Viagra before going through the body scanner to give them something to really enjoy. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.banalleakage.com/2009/12/31/reactive-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banalleakage.com/?p=2649#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>Ditto. If I am going to give up my privacy, let it AT LEAST BE FOR SOMETHING THAT MIGHT ACTUALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto. If I am going to give up my privacy, let it AT LEAST BE FOR SOMETHING THAT MIGHT ACTUALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
